基础医学与临床 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 882-886.doi: 10.16352/j.issn.1001-6325.2026.06.0882

• 医学教育 • 上一篇    

急诊科住院医师规范化培训标准实施现状调查及改进策略

刘洋, 杨惊, 朱华栋, 刘继海, 李毅, 刘安雷*, 徐军*   

  1. 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院 北京协和医院急诊科 疑难重症及罕见病全国重点实验室北京协和医院急危重症药械创新实验室,北京 100730
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-03 修回日期:2026-03-27 出版日期:2026-06-05 发布日期:2026-05-27
  • 通讯作者: *lalperfect@163.com;xujunfree@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京协和医学院2025年中央高校教育教学改革专项资金支持项目(2025bkjg014);北京市教育科学“十四五”规划2025年度一般课题(CDDB25234);北京协和医院青年拔尖人才培养项目(UBJ10550)

Implementation status and improvement strategies of the standardized residency training standards in emergency medicine

LIU Yang, YANG Jing, ZHU Huadong, LIU Jihai, LI Yi, LIU Anlei*, XU Jun*   

  1. Department of Emergency, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Critical and Emergency Pharmaceuticals & Medical Devices Innovation Lab,Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2026-03-03 Revised:2026-03-27 Online:2026-06-05 Published:2026-05-27
  • Contact: *lalperfect@163.com;xujunfree@126.com

摘要: 目的 调查《住院医师规范化培训内容与标准(2022年版)》在急诊科住院医师规范化培训基地中的实施现状及相关问题,为未来标准优化提供依据。方法 采用横断面问卷调查方法,对全国急诊科住培基地相关教学管理人员及住院医师进行调查。问卷内容包括培训标准实施认知与现实挑战、教学措施实施与效能评价、培训考核评价与改革建议等。结果 共回收有效问卷156份。97.44%的受访者认同以临床岗位胜任力为培训核心目标。38.46%倾向在统一基本标准框架下给予区域层面适度弹性。标准实施过程中,62.18%认为教学激励不足及临床科研压力过大是主要困难。多数教学活动已常规开展,实践导向型教学活动被评价为“高效”的比例高于部分理论型活动。在培训考核方面,83.33%建议由培训基地结合自身特点设计过程考核,78.21%支持增加临床病例分析比重和难度。结论 急诊科住培标准总体理念获得广泛认同,但在执行保障、教学优化及考核改革方面仍有提升空间。调查结果可为未来培训标准修订与质量提升提供实践参考。

关键词: 住院医师规范化培训, 急诊医学, 培训标准, 核心胜任力, 医学教育改革

Abstract: Objective To investigate the implementation status of the 2022 edition of the Standardized Residency Training Content and Standards in emergency medicine residency training bases and to identify existing challenges, in order to provide evidence for future optimization of the standards. Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted among teaching administrators and residents from emergency medicine residency training bases nationwide. The questionnaire covered perceptions of standard implementation and practical challenges, implementation and effectiveness of teaching measures, as well as evaluation and reform suggestions regarding the assessment system. Results A total of 156 valid responses were collected. Most respondents (97.44%) agreed that clinical competency should serve as the core training objective. Approximately 38.46% supported allowing moderate regional flexibility within a unified national framework. During implementation, insufficient teaching incentives and heavy clinical and research workload was identified as major challenges (62.18%). Most teaching activities were routinely implemented, and practice-oriented activities were more frequently rated as effective compared with some theory-based activities. Regarding assessment, 83.33% recommended that process evaluations be tailored by individual training bases, and 78.21% supported increasing the proportion and difficulty of case-based analysis. Conclusions The overall philosophy of the emergency medicine residency training standards has been widely recognized. However, further improvements are needed in institutional support, teaching optimization, and competency-oriented assessment reform. The findings of this study provide practical evidence for future revision of the standards and continuous quality improvement in residency training.

Key words: standardized residency training, emergency medicine, training standards, core competency, medical education reform

中图分类号: