基础医学与临床 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11): 1508-1512.doi: 10.16352/j.issn.1001-6325.2026.11.1508

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字PCR在重症肺炎患者中的临床价值

侯燕琳1, 刘振亚1, 闫丽茹2, 高广生2*   

  1. 1.山东第二医科大学 临床医学院,山东 潍坊 261000;
    2.山东第一医科大学附属中心医院 神经重症医学科,山东 济南 250000
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-25 修回日期:2026-06-22 出版日期:2026-11-05 发布日期:2026-10-26
  • 通讯作者: *shenggao163@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东病理生理学会危重病医学专业科研专项(2021BS007);山东省医药卫生科技发展计划(02203020343)

Clinical value of digital PCR in patients with severe pneumonia

HOU Yanlin1, LIU Zhenya1, YAN Liru2, GAO Guangsheng2*   

  1. 1. School of Clinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang 261000;
    2. Department of Neurocritical Care Medicine, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250000, China
  • Received:2026-01-25 Revised:2026-06-22 Online:2026-11-05 Published:2026-10-26
  • Contact: *shenggao163@163.com

摘要: 目的 探讨数字聚合酶链式反应(dPCR)在重症肺炎患者中的检测优势和临床价值。方法 选取2021年3月至2023年5月期间在山东第一医科大学附属中心医院重症医学科收治的93例重症肺炎患者,留取支气管肺泡灌洗液进行dPCR和传统培养,回顾性分析dPCR在重症肺炎患者中的检测优势和临床价值。结果 病原体检测显示,dPCR总检出率更高(P<0.05),其中,革兰阳性菌检出率显著高于常规培养(P<0.05);dPCR在检出≥2种病原体方面显著优于常规培养(均P<0.001)。麦克尼马尔(McNemar)检验提示,dPCR单独阳性率远高于常规培养,两者差异显著(P<0.001)。结论 数字PCR在病原体检测中较常规培养法具有更高的敏感性,尤其在混合感染检出方面优势显著,对指导临床调整抗生素具有重要价值。

关键词: 数字PCR, 重症肺炎, 病原体检测, 混合感染

Abstract: Objective To explore the laboratory strengthens and clinical value of digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) in patients with severe pneumonia. Methods A total of 93 patients with severe pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at the Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University from March 2021 to May 2023 were selected and broncho-alveolar lavage fluid was sampled. Both dPCR and classic culture method were performed simultaneously. A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the strengthens of the methodology and clinical value of dPCR in patients with severe pneumonia. Results Pathogen detection showed a higher positive rate by dPCR as compared to the classic method (P<0.05); Specifically, the positive detection rate of Gram-positive bacteria was significantly higher than that of classic bacteria culture(P<0.05). Furthermore, dPCR was significantly superior to conventional culture in detecting ≥2 pathogens(all P<0.001). The McNemar′s test indicated that the positive rate of dPCR alone was significantly higher than that of routine culture(P<0.001). Conclusions Dihiysl PCR method shows a higher sensitivity than classic bacteria culture in pathogen detection, especially used for the samples from multiple pathogens infections, so is of great value in guiding clinical adjustments to antibiotic therapy.

Key words: digital PCR, severe pneumonia, pathogen detection, mixed infection

中图分类号: